E-Maus

Hi Hans Nice to see you. You can believe me, I would not have the courage "without the blessing" of Dietrich invest in it. It was a gift for my son, at the end of his medical studies greetings Jacek

Rich With all due respect, but I can not agree with this opinion. There are fixed hardware that allow for unambiguous attribution of production or even a version of the badges, to a specific manufacturer greetings Jacek

I'm sorry, the same mistake again. Now in English Hi Rich I understand your doubts, this is Dietrich's opinion on this subject from WAF Jacek

HiRich Rozumiem twoje wątpliwości, oto opinia Dietricha na ten temat z WAF KR Jacek Jacek

Forgive me, I did not mean to offend you, but "Very cool ..." brings nothing constructive in addition to the nice words, and this is a really interesting transitional version KR Jacek

Cool!, This brings a lot to the topic

I'm sorry, I have not been here for a long time. Once again in a language that is understandable to everyone This is the first form of oak leaves, not the second, although the oak blocks are marked "900 21". Unusual, but rare. Frendly greetings Jack

Cześć chłopaki Jest to pierwsza forma zrębów dębowych, nie druga, chociaż dębowe bloki oznaczone są "900 21". Niezwykłe, ale rzadkie. Frendly pozdrowienia Jacek

This is very sad ... Jacek

You're right , it's the same item KR Jacek

Hi Richard I also do not see a problem with it. My for comparison KR Jacek

Thank you Kevin , very appreciated KR Jacek

The question as to the authenticity of the document in the first posts is still valid greets Jacek

Uff ... waste of time , the end of it. I'ts not a signature of Kruger. Excuse me , I could earlier see exactly Jacek ps: This is an original signature

Hi I wanted to ask because I have no knowledge of the documents. What is your opinion ? Whether it is the signature of Walter Kruger ? . Thank you for your time. KR Jacek